Shakey's Madness: Does a Mental Disorder Reveal the "Real" William Shakespeare?

Looking for a fun but informative read? 'Shakey's Madness' is a well-researched and well-rounded argument around the *real* author of 'The First Folio'. Using academic resources including The Folger Shakespeare Library, Los Angeles real estate broker Robert Boog sets out to prove to us that the real author of the work currently attributed to William Shakespeare was actually someone else. A person who experienced bipolar affective disorder, and this information may help us to uncover the true author of these Elizabethan plays and sonnets. I can't say I've ever particularly doubted that Shakespeare's work was written by William Shakespeare; that is I was familiar with the theory that they were written by someone else, it had just never interested me enough to look into it. I was curious about 'Shakey's Madness' as a neutral observer, and I found that the author formed his arguments in a way that was entertaining, informative, and interesting. It reminded me of a university essay, with references to academics and further sources but I found it easy to follow along with. I feel this would be an interesting read regardless of which side of this particular argument you fall into. A friend of mine called this book 'important' because Boog makes some original and controversial observations. Spoiler alert: in the end he leaves it up for the reader to decide if we agree with the argument put in front of us. I think that this book is an interesting one to ponder for those looking to learn more about the Oxfordian arguments as well as those looking for more evidence to support that theory. You might also learn something about the nuanced disorder of bipolar along the way which he seems passionate about. It got me wondering if anyone close to Mr. Boog might also suffer from bipolar disorder? Entertaining, original and informative, I suggest you check out this book. It's a short, fun read that will have you talking about Shakespeare at your next dinner party. Here is what Shakey's Madness hopes to answer: Why did he do it? If the "real" author was a nobleman, why would he give away his masterpieces to a commoner? If William Shakespeare acted as a front for a nobleman, wouldn't there need to be a massive conspiracy to hide the secret? Is there proof in the author's style, brilliance and personal imprimatur? WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING Here is what people who have read "Shakey's Madness" have said: · I thought Shakespeare was old and boring, but this book is remarkably interesting, and I could not put it down. · Well-written with a lot of factual information to back up the claims which is great! "Even if I may not totally buy what you are selling, you did a good job presenting your argument and I appreciated the kindness you showed to people with BD. My aunt has BD." "I loved your college story of rewriting Shakespeare's Sonnet 116 and then getting a note to see your instructor. My heart was pounding reading it! LOL"