Architecture of Civic Coherence Under Law

Architecture of Civic Coherence Under Law presents a rigorous, non-partisan framework for understanding why modern governance systems drift—and how they can correct without collapse. Rather than arguing for specific policies or political outcomes, this book examines the structure of decision-making itself. It identifies a recurring inversion in modern institutions, where power and resources move before purpose is clearly defined, authority persists without renewal, and meaning is justified only after the fact. Over time, this inversion produces systems that continue to operate while losing alignment, accountability, and public trust. Drawing directly from constitutional design, administrative law, and systems theory, the book introduces a trinary model of governance grounded in restraint, reversibility, and proof. It reframes failure not as corruption or incompetence, but as a detectable signal of misalignment—one that can be corrected lawfully through pause, redesign, verification, and reauthorization. Governance, in this model, is not optimized for constant action, but for coherence under law. This work offers a practical operating discipline for legislators, public administrators, legal scholars, and civic thinkers who seek reform without revolution. It demonstrates how existing constitutional mechanisms—separation of powers, due process, time-bound authority, and review—already provide everything needed to restore legitimacy, if applied in the proper order. Architecture of Civic Coherence Under Law is not a manifesto. It is a systems manual for democratic governance—designed to endure beyond ideology, administrations, and crises.